Historical ontology of culture or Ontology of the culture of the present in Michel Foucault

Historical ontology of culture or Ontology of the culture of the pFroAge to the effective historical episteme in the Contemporary Age

Abstract

We start from the Contemporary Age to problematize a theme that was introduced in the Modern Age. Culture is the place of enunciations, sometimes knowledge, sometimes knowledge, from an entire era. Philosophy starts to adjudicate for validation, when then we would have Philosophy, History and the Epistemology of Science, social or human. To do so, we used, with critical or analytical arch-rationalism, just arch-rationalism, as a System of Thought that problematizes the use of subjectivity in instrumental rationality and in the technical reproducibility of enunciation. We also work, with the archeogenealogical method, to demarcate the historical moment of the enunciation, in order to unearth the time and place of the enunciations. Therefore, the set of studies on Ontology of historical culture and Ontology of present culture should cover the problematization of three main axes in the statements: the theoretical, moment in which we question the form of truth or falsehood through which we constitute ourselves as subjects qua object; the ethical, moment in which we question the political form through which we constitute ourselves as subjects as an object; and the theoretical, moment in which we question the theoretical and ethical way in which we constitute ourselves as subjects who constitute other subjects as objects. It is in this sense of excavating the conditions for the possibility of the existence of the enunciation, linked to the objects present in the subjectivity of the subjects, that we will find the clarification of the enunciations. The positivity of statements does not concern only those related to the nature of its history, its geography, its architecture, much less to the functionality of language or language, but above all those that concern its theoretical and methodological nature of its foundation epistemological. The positivity of the utterances does not only concern the immediate past of their contingencies, but rather the place of the enunciative function that currently occupies the instrumental rationality and technical reproducibility of the use of the file and the writing in the utterance.