The study of measurement: A comparative study between the United States and Spain
Conteúdo do artigo principal
Resumo
This comparative research analyzes the use of visual support aids by measurement instruction in United States and Spanish lower primary and lower secondary classes. Visual supports—such as diagrams, models, and simulations—enhance conceptual understanding by relating abstract and concrete thinking. Classroom observation, teacher interviews, student testing, and material examination were carried out in 20 schools across each country during the research, and the effect of visual aids on procedure and concept math learning was ascertained. Results show that Spanish classrooms use visual supports more deliberately and strongly than U.S. classrooms. Spanish teachers used visual supports routinely in class and conceptually relevant, whereas U.S. teachers saw visuals as being adjunctive, rather than main. Spanish students were more engaged and possessed a higher level of conceptual knowledge, as was indicated in a Measurement Proficiency Assessment (MPA), where their post-test gain over the pre-test was higher than that of the U.S. students, especially on conceptual items. The study found that teacher preparation, beliefs, and curriculum alignment affect the use and effectiveness of visual aids notably. Visual pedagogy is facilitated by curricular policy and systemic support in Spain, but high-stakes testing and decentralized policy in the U.S. restrict its application. The findings show that the integration of visual supports in a harmonious way, supported by policy and teacher preparation, enhances learning outcome improvement and mathematics instruction equity.
Downloads
Detalhes do artigo

Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Uma nova publicação de artigo anteriormente publicado na Revista Baiana de Educação Matemática, fica sujeita à expressa menção da precedência de sua publicação neste periódico, seguindo as normas de referência. Autores que publicam na RBEM concordam com os seguintes termos:
-
O Conselho Editorial se reserva ao direito de efetuar, nos originais, alterações de ordem normativa, sintática, ortográfica e bibliográfica com vistas a manter o padrão culto da língua, respeitando, porém, o estilo dos autores. As provas finais poderão ou não ser enviadas aos autores.
-
Autores mantém os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC-SA).
-
Autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista, exemplo: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro, com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial na RBEM.
-
Autores têm permissão e são estimulados a publicar e distribuir seu trabalho online — em repositórios institucionais, página pessoal, rede social ou demais sites de divulgação científica.
Referências
Arthur-Kelly, M., Sigafoos, J., Green, V., Mathisen, B., & Arthur-Kelly, R. (2009). Issues in the use of visual supports to promote communication in individuals with autism spectrum disorder. Disability and rehabilitation, 31(18), 1474-1486. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280802590629
Brown, C. M., Packer, T. L., & Passmore, A. (2013). Adequacy of the regular early education classroom environment for students with visual impairment. The Journal of Special Education, 46(4), 223-232. https://doi.org/10.1177/002246691039737
Cohen, A., & Demchak, M. (2018). Use of visual supports to increase task independence in students with severe disabilities in inclusive educational settings. Education and training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 53(1), 84-99.
Hayes, G. R., Hirano, S., Marcu, G., Monibi, M., Nguyen, D. H., & Yeganyan, M. (2010). Interactive visual supports for children with autism. Personal and ubiquitous computing, 14(7), 663-680.
Katsioloudis, P. (2010). Identification of Quality Visual-Based Learning Material for Technology Education. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 47(1), 70-98.
Manitsa, I., & Doikou, M. (2022). Social support for students with visual impairments in educational institutions: An integrative literature review. British Journal of Visual Impairment, 40(1), 29-47. https://doi.org/10.1177/0264619620941885
Mrstik, S. L., Vasquez, E., & Pearl, C. (2018). The effects of mentor instruction on teaching visual supports to novice, special education teachers. International Journal of Instruction, 11(1), 411-424.
Renkl, A., & Scheiter, K. (2017). Studying visual displays: How to instructionally support learning. Educational Psychology Review, 29(3), 599-621.
Sein, N. A. (2022). Enhancing the Educational Environment: Improving Student Outcome Using Visual Supports. PANDION: The Osprey Journal of Research and Ideas, 3(1), 7.
Solano-Flores, G., Wang, C., Kachchaf, R., Soltero-Gonzalez, L., & Nguyen-Le, K. (2014). Developing testing accommodations for English language learners: Illustrations as visual supports for item accessibility. Educational Assessment, 19(4), 267-283. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2014.964116
Wu, C. M., & Li, P. (2019). The visual aesthetics measurement on interface design education. Journal of the Society for Information Display, 27(3), 138-146. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsid.751